
01:00:58
Hi Krista - we can send a copy of the slides when we send a wrap-up after the webinar.

01:01:08
Thank you!

01:02:12
When will the recording be available?

01:03:08
Does anyone here do the discussion boards? It's something we are looking at but I would love to talk to someone who is doing it already

01:03:41
Can you give examples where the learner teams are external to the CE provider?

01:05:45
When we identify barriers in the planning process and document this on our planning document, we make sure those barriers and techniques for addressing those barriers are called out in the educational activity.

01:11:49
very helpful!

01:14:42
Will we have access to the video of this webinar?

01:16:20
The AAPA House of Delegates adopted the Standards for Integrity last week. They are now official accreditation policy for AAPA

01:16:53
Eric - that's great news! Thanks for sharing.

01:17:15
Great, Eric! I will have Tamar reach out to you so we can be sure to communicate this to our shared audiences.

01:18:01
Hi Mary - yes, we’ll be sharing a copy of the recording after the webinar as well.

01:28:27
Does this separation include virtual events? I believe we have discussed this prior but not sure if anything has changed.

01:28:41
Please define “ peer review “.

01:28:46
for virtual events - how does the 'separation of spaces' work? if the promotion takes place on a different part of the live virtual site - does that count as 'separate space'?

01:28:49
Question: In disclosures to the learners, do we need to simply state the relationships have been mitigated, or do we need to state how?

01:29:06
Hi, Kim. Yes - separation applies to virtual events as well as in-person events. Separate link or breakout room in Zoom, for example would count.

01:29:12
can a non-conflicted planner still serve as an IR for both other planners and speakers?

01:29:56
Can disclose to learners the "how" of mitigation, but not required to do so. Acceptable to just include the statement that relevant financial relationships were mitigated.

01:30:04
@Dimitra and Kate - thank you!

01:30:23
Thanks @Dimitra & Kate

01:30:42
Yes, Allyson. Non-conflicted person could assist with mitigation for planners and faculty.

01:30:59
Who are considered to be peers? Are members of the healthcare team peers? Is it confined to peers of the speaker - physician speaker must be reviewed by a physician peer.

01:31:46
@Jeanne - JA does not define "peer." It would be up to you and your program to decide who would be qualified to help mitigate.

01:32:20
Thanks Dion

01:32:39
Great presentation Dion-thank you!

01:34:55
That is awesome.

01:34:58
When will this be effective.

01:35:03
That is wonderful!

01:35:18
Love the idea of a dashboard, that will be so helpful!

01:35:43
Very cool and will help with my annual reports!

01:36:26
Can speakers w/ relationships "assist" the provider (as the 1st step) in identifying relevant relationships? The provider would then do their process to confirm/double check.

01:37:37
re: EMs... YAYAYAYAY!

01:37:40
If you remove the target audience - how does that impact pharmacy?

01:37:40
that will be wonderful!

01:37:54
This is AWESOME!!

01:37:58
I think I said this during our last update but these changes are like an early Christmas gift to all of us! SO excited!

01:38:28
Awesome!!!

01:38:29
Double YAY!

01:38:35
Our team identified a couple of changes listed on the ACCME site but not with the JA PARS, E.g. Competencies, Modified Evaluation Questions. Are these items applicable to JA PARS also?

01:38:56
Hallelujah! 🙌🏽

01:38:58
Is there some sort of disclosure text that should be used for activities presenting non-clinical topics (faculty development)?

01:39:08
So excited for us.

01:39:20
Will the repeated activities still be considered as individual activities?

01:39:29
What if future iterations of an activity add MOC, etc. Will it still be one entry with the addition of dates or will they need to be separated?

01:39:56
How does removing hours of instructions impact CPE Monitor reporting for pharmacy?

01:40:04
]

01:40:17
@Patrick, if the activity meets the exceptions, then there is no requirement for disclosure. Providers would be free to add a statement, but it would not be required by JA.

01:40:29
Echoing Wendi Martin’s question above, if you remove the target audience - how does that impact pharmacy?

01:40:45
If an enduring material stays open, will the system automatically add the completion numbers to the existing data inputted - or will the existing completion number get overridden? We would like to upload completions throughout the year.

01:42:21
So now if my activity is not providing pharmacy credit but a pharmacist does attend, will I be able to count them in my Attendance Counts since Pharmacy in the past was always pulled from CPE Monitor?

01:44:49
Great question Andrea - same question here!

01:45:18
NICE!!!!

01:45:20
That is the best!!!

01:45:43
Very excited about the JAC tagging feature!

01:46:10
@Diane, Ditto.

01:47:02
Can you provide guidance for choosing an activity format when a program includes a blend of livestream and pre-recorded material? Choosing the "other" category seems to default to the UAN home study designation, except the activity does include a live component. Is another activity format recommended?

01:47:09
Thank you very much!

01:47:19
When will the tools be available so our IT programmers can get started on formatting our automated reports.

01:47:29
It might be nice, once JA-PARS goes live, to host an optional Zoom meeting where people can ask questions about entering activities and share screens if necessary. Sort of a shared troubleshooting session.

01:47:59
Would like to know the answer to Karen Kanefield's question.

01:49:27
I added a credit type per the midyear questionnaire. when may I start offering that credit type?

01:49:37
What process do you use to determine 'by the team for the team' threshold? is it IPCE credit?

01:49:48
Does the BOC accreditation include their EBP credit?

01:49:57
10 orgs, fantastic news!

01:50:09
@Denise and @Karen - ACPE will review the question and get back to you. For all - we will include this as an FAQ in JA-PARS.

01:50:10
I keep getting asked when PT and OT will be coming on board. ???

01:50:30
Great job JA! Bring 'em all under the same system! #bytheteamfortheteam #theentireteam

01:50:36
genetic counselors would be great to add

01:50:51
@Karen - we would LOVE to have PT and OT join. We've had discussions with both. Please reach out to those accreditors and encourage them to contact/join us!!!

01:51:03
Pain point: New York State Education Dept. still does not accept APA or ASWB credits under JA

01:51:31
@John - genetic counselors are a great idea. If you know a contact, reach out to them and have them get in touch.

01:51:56
Thanks, Dimitra!

01:52:09
If we are awaiting our JA decision, will we be able to select additional accreditations upon approval? Or will we have to wait to offer them until the new year with the November survey?

01:52:44
@Whitney - yes - if you are scheduled to receive a decision mid year, you will be able to elect any of the additional professions at that time.

01:54:21
I have a question about the updated JA-PARS, if I already have activities in our JA-PARS right now, will that information be transferred over once the new system is available?

01:54:55
If you choose to go toward commendation, can you write to > 7 criteria OR do you have to choose only to write to 7. ,

01:55:19
These links will be clickable in the PDF of the slides that we send after the webinar.

01:55:21
Our 2022 reporting year begins July 1 - when will I be able to begin adding activities for 2022 in JA PARS?

01:55:40
@Andrea - all data currently in JA PARS will be imported into new JA PARS. So keep reporting data...

01:55:41
I suddenly have a thunderstorm and my connection keeps freezing, so we’re going to switch to Austen sharing her screen after Jennifer

01:56:19
Sorry - THIS is what I was trying to send - https://acpe-accredit.formstack.com/forms/spring_2020_cpe_field_reviewer_interest_form_copy

01:56:26
@MJSwartz- we ask that providers choose seven criteria and respond just to those.

01:56:28
@M Jane - we ask providers to choose and only submit for 7 criteria for commendation.

01:57:17
Feel free to chat in your comments as well!

01:57:49
You can also email your comments to info@jointaccreditation.org

01:59:48
The information shared today has been very helpful. Thank you.

02:00:47
Always look forward to these meetings. All of you are so helpful-thank you for all your hard work.

02:00:56
What are some theme ideas you have for the 2021 JA Summit? https://www.menti.com/fmpje775or

02:01:22
For commendation, it has been our organization's experience that you really need be tracking this weekly to make sure that you are hitting the benchmarks. Additionally, I suggest that you aim for 10 so that you hit 7. Best of luck!

02:04:40
academy@accme.org

02:05:33
CHCP recertification credits?

02:06:17
Thank you so much! This has been very helpful.

02:06:18
This was great, thanks so much!

02:06:19
thanks for access to the academy!

02:06:27
Thanks everyone!! (From Dimitra and Kate)!!

02:06:31
Thanks everyone!

02:06:31
Thank you!

02:06:32
Thank you!

02:06:39
Thanks all!