
01:09:31
💥What excites you about IPCE?

01:09:39
Collaboration

01:09:39
Teamwork

01:09:39
opportunity

01:09:39
Impact

01:09:40
Collaboration

01:09:40
Collaboration

01:09:40
collaboration

01:09:40
collaboration

01:09:40
collaboration

01:09:40
teamwork

01:09:41
team based education

01:09:41
Collaboration!

01:09:42
teamwork

01:09:42
innovation

01:09:42
collaboration

01:09:42
real

01:09:42
variety

01:09:42
team

01:09:42
team

01:09:42
collaboration

01:09:42
Collaboration

01:09:42
UNIVERSAL

01:09:42
collaboration

01:09:42
collaboration

01:09:42
Collaboration

01:09:42
innovation

01:09:43
opportunity

01:09:43
teamwork

01:09:43
collaboration

01:09:43
Community

01:09:43
impact

01:09:43
collaboration

01:09:43
collaboration

01:09:44
inclusivity

01:09:44
teamwork!

01:09:44
Collaboration!

01:09:44
team

01:09:44
collaboration

01:09:44
Teamwork

01:09:44
collaboration

01:09:44
Collaboration

01:09:44
networking

01:09:44
Collaboration

01:09:44
team

01:09:44
team

01:09:45
Teamwork

01:09:45
teamwork

01:09:45
togetherness

01:09:45
Team

01:09:45
potential

01:09:45
teamwork

01:09:45
inclusive

01:09:45
Collaboration

01:09:45
trust

01:09:45
collab

01:09:46
communication

01:09:46
teams

01:09:46
education

01:09:46
teamwork

01:09:46
Teams

01:09:47
teamwork

01:09:47
team building

01:09:47
colaboration

01:09:47
teamwork

01:09:47
coordination

01:09:47
Collab

01:09:47
collaboration

01:09:47
teams

01:09:47
learners

01:09:48
Impact

01:09:48
parnership

01:09:48
impact

01:09:48
team

01:09:48
together

01:09:48
community

01:09:48
Teamwork

01:09:48
Change

01:09:48
Collabration

01:09:49
Teamwork

01:09:49
team

01:09:50
impact

01:09:50
learning

01:09:50
Streamlining

01:09:50
innovation

01:09:51
collaboration

01:09:51
teamwork

01:09:51
teamwork

01:09:51
Collaboration

01:09:52
teamwork

01:09:52
Teamwork

01:09:52
Sharing

01:09:52
Interprofessional

01:09:52
innovation

01:09:52
networking

01:09:53
potential

01:09:54
awareness

01:09:54
teamwork

01:09:55
collaboration

01:09:55
potential

01:09:59
collabration

01:10:00
possibility

01:10:01
Inter professional

01:10:06
🚩What challenges you most about IPCE?

01:10:10
Buyin

01:10:11
Silos

01:10:11
planning

01:10:11
silos

01:10:11
Silos

01:10:13
buy in

01:10:14
silos

01:10:14
assessment

01:10:14
collaboration

01:10:15
silos

01:10:15
planning

01:10:15
culture

01:10:16
Silos

01:10:16
balance

01:10:16
Buy in/time

01:10:16
IT

01:10:16
Silos

01:10:17
Silos

01:10:17
design

01:10:17
different requirements

01:10:17
silos

01:10:17
time

01:10:17
planning

01:10:17
planning

01:10:17
time

01:10:18
resistance

01:10:18
explaining it to all

01:10:18
buy in

01:10:18
silos

01:10:18
schedules

01:10:18
Silos

01:10:18
standards

01:10:18
mitigating disclosures

01:10:18
standards

01:10:19
time

01:10:19
culture

01:10:19
Consistency

01:10:19
silos

01:10:19
engagement

01:10:20
compliance

01:10:20
aligning standards

01:10:20
collaboration

01:10:20
Meeting the needs of all professions

01:10:21
Buy-in

01:10:21
Collaboration

01:10:21
planning committee

01:10:21
faculty

01:10:21
understanding

01:10:21
resistance

01:10:22
time

01:10:22
inclusion

01:10:22
Complicated

01:10:22
Silos

01:10:23
time

01:10:23
buyin

01:10:23
Compliance

01:10:24
planning

01:10:24
silow

01:10:24
software

01:10:25
culture change

01:10:25
understanding

01:10:25
engagement

01:10:26
alignment

01:10:27
Stateboards

01:10:27
multiple leadership structures

01:10:28
buy in

01:10:28
Compliance

01:10:28
Change

01:10:29
credits

01:10:29
meeting all team members' needs

01:10:29
collaboration

01:10:30
buyin

01:10:30
differences

01:10:32
engagement

01:10:33
engagement

01:10:34
silos

01:10:34
transition to work from home over the last 2 years

01:10:34
Compliance

01:10:34
current culture

01:10:34
change

01:10:35
Stakeholders

01:10:37
collaboration

01:10:40
Information

01:10:41
coordination

01:10:43
🎯What do you want most to give to your learners?

01:10:47
impact

01:10:48
Value

01:10:48
Value

01:10:48
excellence

01:10:49
power

01:10:49
Knowledge

01:10:49
quality

01:10:49
knowledge

01:10:50
onestopshop

01:10:50
impact

01:10:50
value

01:10:50
knowledge

01:10:51
quality

01:10:51
communication tools

01:10:51
value

01:10:51
confidence

01:10:51
access

01:10:52
quality

01:10:52
Great experience.

01:10:52
Experience

01:10:53
practical application

01:10:53
current topics

01:10:53
Value

01:10:53
All the things!!

01:10:53
Value

01:10:54
knowledge

01:10:54
value

01:10:54
knowledge

01:10:54
Value

01:10:54
practical

01:10:54
outcomes

01:10:54
Impact

01:10:54
Satisfaction

01:10:54
New

01:10:54
quality

01:10:54
innovation

01:10:54
quality

01:10:55
knowledge

01:10:55
opportunity

01:10:56
usefulness

01:10:56
value

01:10:56
value

01:10:56
Knowledge

01:10:56
value

01:10:56
tools

01:10:56
quality

01:10:56
value

01:10:56
skills

01:10:56
confidence

01:10:56
Quality

01:10:56
Impact

01:10:56
knowledge

01:10:56
Value

01:10:57
value

01:10:57
value

01:10:57
knowledge

01:10:57
Quality

01:10:57
value

01:10:58
knowledge

01:10:58
opportunities

01:10:58
experiences

01:10:58
Value

01:10:58
quality education

01:10:58
experience

01:10:59
Quality

01:10:59
impact

01:10:59
impact

01:10:59
quality

01:11:00
best patient care

01:11:00
quality

01:11:00
impact

01:11:00
meaningfulness

01:11:01
up to date information

01:11:01
quality

01:11:02
collaboration of the team

01:11:02
knowledge

01:11:03
quality

01:11:03
critical thinking

01:11:03
quality

01:11:03
quality

01:11:03
ability

01:11:04
impact

01:11:04
Experience

01:11:04
collaboration

01:11:06
Quality

01:11:06
quality

01:11:07
quality

01:11:07
EBP

01:11:07
Quality

01:11:08
empowerment

01:11:10
outcomes

01:11:15
outcomes

01:17:37
For those of you that just joined us, here is a PDF of the slides for today.

01:19:42
Starting July 1, we are doing all ten!

01:20:05
👏

01:20:19
Any update on when if PT/OT will join?

01:20:50
Would love to see Rehab added. They are so involved in the care team.

01:22:05
With the new announcement from JA with AOA adoption of the Standards for Integrity and Independence - is it anticipated that someday AOA may fall under this, as well?

01:22:45
Chaplains?

01:22:46
Rehab = PT/OT/SLP

01:22:54
Speech

01:23:03
Genetic Counselors?

01:23:05
audiology

01:23:05
Lab professionals!

01:23:20
National Counselors

01:23:21
respiratory

01:23:24
Respiratory Therapy

01:23:29
lab

01:23:30
NBCC

01:23:35
Rad Techs?

01:23:51
NBCC - Counselors

01:23:58
genetic counselors

01:24:04
Kate is right, we found out about JA and joined as an associate member because of a provider that requested we look in to joining JA.

01:24:08
Child Life Professionals

01:24:08
ACHE

01:24:25
imaging technologists

01:26:48
Thank you everyone, these are all great additions! Most effective method is to please reach out to that specific accreditor, inform them of Joint Accreditation and feel free to point them to the Joint Accreditation website and/or email info@jointaccreditation.org

01:27:25
@Lisa Casler Haun - appreciate the feedback!

01:27:36
Have you considered writing a letter to lab, RT, PT, OT, EMS, Xray, etc. an invite them to consider this option?

01:29:36
@Scott Dulebohn - We have not reached out to accreditors directly. Ce accreditors meet regularly and we provide updates to each of our accreditation programs, including Joint Accreditation. We can further discuss based on the suggested list of additional professions. Thank you!

01:31:17
Yes

01:31:17
yes

01:31:17
Yes.

01:31:18
Yes

01:31:18
Yes

01:31:18
yes

01:31:18
yes

01:31:19
yes

01:31:19
yes

01:31:19
yes

01:31:20
Yes

01:31:20
Yes

01:31:20
yes

01:31:20
not team based gap

01:31:21
Yes

01:31:21
Yes

01:31:22
yes

01:31:22
Yes

01:31:23
yes

01:31:24
yes

01:31:24
yes

01:31:24
Yes

01:31:25
yes

01:31:29
yes

01:31:31
yes

01:31:33
yes

01:31:33
Yes

01:31:35
yes

01:31:36
Yes

01:31:39
Yes

01:31:39
yes

01:31:43
yes

01:31:49
yes

01:31:49
Yes

01:31:49
yes

01:31:50
yes

01:31:50
Yes

01:31:50
yes

01:31:51
Yes

01:31:52
yes

01:31:52
yes

01:31:52
yes

01:31:52
yes

01:31:52
yes

01:31:52
Yes

01:31:53
yes

01:31:53
yes

01:31:53
yes

01:31:54
yes

01:31:55
yes, could add PA

01:31:55
yes

01:31:55
yes

01:31:57
yes

01:31:57
yes

01:31:57
Yes

01:31:58
yes

01:31:58
Yes.

01:31:58
Yes, but maybe patients/families should also be represented

01:31:58
audience seems appropriate

01:32:03
yes

01:32:04
they do - but woudl add afew

01:32:05
yes,

01:32:09
unclear

01:32:14
No

01:32:19
no

01:32:20
Not fully - no physician planner

01:32:22
No, not physician

01:32:23
yes

01:32:23
They need MD

01:32:25
no

01:32:26
if your phys planner was missing, then no

01:32:26
Physicians are not represented.

01:32:28
no

01:32:29
No - MD planner needed

01:32:30
need an MD

01:32:30
no

01:32:31
Need a physician planner

01:32:33
no

01:32:35
No - need md

01:32:36
yes (2 or more)

01:32:39
all except physician

01:32:39
Physician is not represented

01:32:39
physicians are not represented

01:32:42
No. Physicians not represented.

01:32:45
Need either more referenced articles from physicians or a physician planner

01:32:46
I think that it should also include Physician planner

01:32:51
Need MD Planner

01:33:10
No - there should be a physician included in the planning process.

01:33:24
Must we have evidence sources for EACH profession?

01:33:33
You could do a key informant interview with physician members of the team

01:33:52
How would we know? Should we be requesting the article?

01:34:41
If they are present in the planning, do we have to have source evidence documents (published) to support each profession as well?

01:34:48
Is content review considered being part of the "planning?"

01:35:03
so representation by all of TA is required; isn't IPCE @ or more?

01:35:13
I would say review is, as in they can change content and should have COI

01:36:05
@Linda Evans - content review might work but keep in mind that objectives, goals, target audience might all occur prior to actual content development...so we are looking for a planning process that is representative of the target audience.

01:36:35
But the reviewer can change those things too based on feedback, right?

01:37:19
Not a team outcome as stated

01:37:53
yes

01:37:53
I don't know. leaning no.

01:37:53
no

01:37:54
yes

01:37:56
yes

01:37:58
No

01:37:59
no the activity is designed to change the learner only, not the team. Could do both but not just the learner

01:38:01
no

01:38:04
not team based outcome

01:38:05
No

01:38:06
no

01:38:09
Yes.

01:38:10
no

01:38:11
not specific enough outcome

01:38:12
Can you have an activity designated as IPCE and all the key stakeholders are at present in planning and then later on we had another target audience determine the activity was appropriate after planning? Would this still be IPCE or partial IPCE? Can you have both depending on the profession?

01:38:13
No focus on team

01:38:35
No. States that the activity is for the team but isn't evaluating the team.

01:43:09
UNMC is working on publishing a program eval

01:44:49
yes

01:44:51
yes

01:44:52
Yes

01:44:54
yes

01:44:55
yes.

01:44:56
yes

01:44:56
Yes

01:44:56
Yes

01:44:57
yes

01:44:59
yes

01:44:59
Yes

01:44:59
yes

01:44:59
yes

01:44:59
yes

01:45:02
yes

01:45:03
yes

01:45:03
yes

01:45:03
yes

01:45:04
yes.

01:45:09
No

01:45:10
no

01:45:10
no

01:45:11
No

01:45:11
No

01:45:12
no

01:45:12
No

01:45:12
No

01:45:12
no

01:45:14
no

01:45:15
no

01:45:15
no

01:45:15
no

01:45:16
no

01:45:16
no

01:45:18
no

01:45:20
No

01:45:23
no

01:45:24
no

01:45:25
no

01:45:26
no

01:45:27
No. There is no mention of the team.

01:45:30
no does not show how practice was improved

01:45:30
no

01:45:30
no

01:45:32
Not really

01:45:32
maybe to "high quality education" but not the expected results of the program

01:45:33
NO

01:45:34
no

01:45:35
no

01:45:37
Sometimes

01:45:50
No

01:45:58
increasing the # of activities or revenue isn't related to the mission.

01:46:00
looking at only the number of activities and revenue, but not about the outcomes

01:46:28
No

01:46:28
No

01:46:28
no

01:46:29
no

01:46:30
no

01:46:31
no

01:46:32
no

01:46:32
nope

01:46:33
No

01:46:34
no

01:46:34
no

01:46:34
no

01:46:35
no

01:46:35
No.

01:46:35
no

01:46:36
No

01:46:36
no

01:46:38
Not really

01:46:38
no

01:46:39
no

01:46:40
no

01:46:41
No

01:46:41
no

01:46:41
not at all

01:46:41
No

01:46:42
no

01:46:44
no

01:46:46
if they are collect those data, they're not looking at them during their program review

01:46:49
no

01:47:13
Not enough.

01:50:55
Not ideal

01:50:58
It wpild be difficult

01:50:59
probably not

01:51:00
If the response is no, there needs to be answers given to why

01:51:00
Depends on how the questions are formulated.

01:51:03
no

01:51:05
Depends on how specific the question is

01:51:08
No although it depends on the wording of the question.

01:51:58
Do we NEED pt level data? You mentioned case study?

01:52:06
not as single item but you could ask multiple questions like "Did your team meet to have a discussion about processes to do x" and "Did you work with your team to do X" etc

01:52:14
No requirement for patient level data

01:53:53
yes

01:53:53
no

01:53:54
No

01:53:55
no

01:53:56
No.

01:53:56
no

01:53:58
yes. But is it enough?

01:53:58
no

01:53:58
no

01:53:59
yes

01:54:00
No

01:54:00
no

01:54:00
no

01:54:01
no

01:54:14
No..individual responses, not healthcare team

01:54:16
yes

01:54:24
just not team

01:54:31
no

01:54:34
yes for overall program, but no for the team

01:54:35
no

01:54:37
but not HC team

01:54:38
no

01:54:38
no

01:54:39
no

01:54:39
no for team

01:54:39
No

01:54:40
no

01:54:40
no

01:54:40
No

01:54:41
No. only the individual learner.

01:54:42
No

01:55:55
If you are asking the individual a question about how they have improved their performance as a member of team sufficient?

01:56:36
Cyndi, if the question is asked in relation to the team, then yes but we would also want to how how. So not yes/no only but expanded beyond that with how.

01:56:47
know how (not how how)

01:57:15
Agree - not a yes no answer.

01:57:30
Is JA considering combined 2 and 11?

01:58:22
We regularly look at the JA criteria to see if they need to be updated but no plan to combine 2 and 11 at this point

01:58:33
Thanks Kathy

01:59:39
Assume you can do either a patient outcome data as a result of an activity or data on the impact of the team but not required to do both.

02:01:46
Can you have a target audience and then list other professions who are welcome to join? The other are not on the planning team?

02:02:11
Thanks Dion

02:02:26
We have some programs who list a group as part of a "target audience" meaning they are welcome but it's not really team-based education. Kathy - are you saying that shouldn't be allowed under JA?

02:02:36
Thanks for clarifying Dion and Kathy.

02:03:06
To clarify - we don't count those programs as part of team-based

02:04:21
Great - thanks for the clarification

02:09:33
Those are great. Also some round up and some round down.

02:09:48
Who allows partial credit and who does not

02:09:50
Thank you Kurt! I'd love an industry-wide alignment.

02:10:50
It would also be helpful to be able to share feedback on the JA PARS portal, not sure who to reach out to though.

02:11:02
Yes! I run into that all the time with our SW and RD groups that were formerly not under JA

02:11:54
Have you included consideration on pharmacological credit for advanced practice nurses? So looking forward to seeing your end result (document) !

02:12:08
This is great! Many thanks to this group for working on this soon-to-be helpful resource.

02:12:10
WOW! Kurt and team... how wonderful. Thank you. I will USE this resource!

02:12:24
Bravo team!! 👏👏👏

02:12:26
This looks awesome.

02:12:28
How are providers utilizing the IPCE credit?

02:12:30
Excited to see this! Thanks!

02:12:50
This would be an extremely wonderful resource.

02:12:50
Look forward to this... topic of discussion each time we add a new profession

02:12:53
Suggest adding CBRN

02:13:06
This is great Thank you

02:13:27
Cant wait to see the final Resource Kit!

02:13:35
Thanks for sharing your journey. This sounds just like what our IPCE team has been doing.

02:13:52
Excited about the final product!

02:16:50
is the logo required or optional to use with the statement?

02:17:41
for joint providers, what if we also have RD and SW audiences? Should those be added to the statement?

02:17:57
for the accreditation statements, do you need to include the parentheses and have the font in italics?

02:20:37
What if you a JA provider but you have an activity that is not appropriate for a team-based activity. For example, a pharmacy activity non-sterile compounding?

02:20:40
With IPCE credit, can you state “up to xx Credit” instead of the absolute “xx credit.”? specifically used for conferences

02:20:56
YAY!!!!

02:21:37
Can the participant enter their own name on the CE certificate or does that have to be done by the program?

02:22:40
For IPCE activities, can we include both the JA statement and IPCE statement even though on t he IPCE mark is required?

02:22:59
For IPCE activities, can we include both the JA statement and IPCE statement even though only the IPCE mark is required?

02:23:15
Social work requires the ASWB ACE statement for Joint Accreditation providers to be on certificates for those providers who have added ASWB ACE credit to their JA approval and wish to offer credit to social workers..

02:24:42
Do participants who are not any of the covered professions get a separate certificate of participation, or can they receive the same one

02:25:16
We understood that IPCE can cover those....

02:25:23
visual examples would be nice

02:25:23
Is that right?

02:25:26
Yes, visuals would be VERY helpful!

02:25:39
YES to visual examples!!!

02:26:13
This is the information for those offering ASWB ACE credit- https://www.jointaccreditation.org//sites/default/files/2019_01_31_%20ASWB_ACE_credit_instructions_for_Joint_Accreditation.pdf

02:26:32
Each state might have different requirements as well

02:34:52
Can we provide RSS for the joint provider ship activities planned by the joint provider outside our system?

02:36:39
Great meeting. Lots of good information.

02:36:41
Thank you all so much for another informative session!

02:36:48
Thanks, nice meeting!

02:36:51
Thank you

02:36:52
thank you

02:36:52
Thank you!

02:36:55
Thank you!

02:36:55
Thank you!

02:36:58
thank you!

02:36:59
Thank you!

02:37:00
thanks

02:37:01
Remember to save the chat for those that want to save it!

02:37:01
thank you

02:37:01
Thanks

02:37:02
Thanks!

02:37:03
thank you!

02:37:03
thank you so much! Always a great meeting

02:37:03
Thank you!